Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Chase & Bank of America coming to 808 Columbus

Mo' Banks: Chase and Bank of America To Room With Whole Foods and Duane Reade at 808 Columbus

Tuesday, December 18, 2007, by Leslie Price

2007_12_808columbus.jpg
Photo of 808 Columbus via Curbed

It's been far, far too long since we've checked in with Columbus Village (aka 808 Columbus) on the Upper West Side. The massive site, located between 97th and 100th Streets, will eventually be home to a Whole Foods, but a fancy grocery store isn't all that the multi-tower retail and residential development has up its sleeve. A tipster writes:

Time for another update on Upper (Upper) West Side developments? Straight from Shopping Center Business to you comes this profile of Winick Realty, which is charged with leasing all 320,000 square feet of that nifty space. The Whole Foods at 97th and Columbus and the Duane Reade are long since confirmed. Now we learn that contracts have been signed with Chase and Bank of America, a real thrill for those of us dreaming about cafes, bookstores, and art houses. But the real mystery in the article is the lease that has supposedly been signed with "Models." Is this a hot new store we should know about? Or is Modell's coming our way?
Now that Whole Foods is on board, anything is possible. Models, Modell's—whatever it is, it's sure to be fantastic. And about the banks: we're talking Chase and Bank of America? So many options! The Upper West Side will never be the same again!

Friday, September 28, 2007

City Council Proposes ''Blasting'' Law

______________________________________________

New Bills: Paralyzing Peeping and Blasting Explosive Regulations

by Courtney Gross
September 4, 2007

There is no doubt the City Council is gearing up to say goodbye to summer and hello to its more hectic legislative schedule. To do that, members have recently introduced bills to regulate everything from Peeping Toms to construction companies.

While some of the bills claim to improve safety in the city, advocacy groups have criticized a number of the measures, calling some overreaching or utterly unenforceable. One organization described a piece of legislation as a threat to civil liberties.

Over the next several months, these bills may or may not come up for hearings. So here is a little preview of what could be in store at City Hall.

Regulation of Blasting

In mid-July, a retaining wall collapsed on the Upper West Side, forcing residents out of their homes. Although the cause of the wall's collapse has not yet been determined, some city officials and residents attribute it to blasting at an adjacent construction site on Columbus Avenue.

In response, the district's councilmember, Melissa Mark Viverito, proposed (Intro 613) legislation that would strengthen the city's blasting regulations, specifically reducing a blasting permit's validity from three years to three months. The applicant would, however, have an opportunity to request a one-year extension.

The legislation would also require a trained representative from the fire department or Department of Buildings to be on site during demolitions involving blasting and excavations on privately owned property.

" At a time when development appears to overrun our neighborhoods and inconvenience our lives, it is our responsibility as legislators to ensure that development is as responsible, safe and accountable as possible," said Viverito following the legislation's introduction.

The legislation also proposes to increase community notification in the area where blasting is occurring and coordinate communication between the departments that oversee this type of construction, such as the Department of Buildings and the fire department.

Although the fire department is charged with issuing an explosives permit, under the new legislation it must coordinate with the Department of Buildings and the Department of Environmental Protection, including noticing them on permit requests.

A spokesperson for the Department of Buildings said it is currently reviewing the legislation and "looks forward" to working with the council.

So far the bill has 13 sponsors, including Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who held a press conference announcing the measure. Quinn's support essentially guarantees the bill's approval.


Zoning Changes in Comm.Bd.7 do NOT affect PWV

___________________________________________________________________
E-Mail Received from Brian Cook, September 28, 2007

I thought I'd start with the shorter answer. The demapping for Con Ed is not 'revocable'. However, Con Ed would like to sell its properties to a developer to make some new money. The problem for Con Ed and the developer is that the zoning for the site only allows for manufacturing usage and a low building density.

The new developer wishes to build residential and therefore, the developer has to go through ULURP. This has given the community the ability to negotiate for things. The community board is currently attempting to get the streets remapped. However, at this point, it does not look like they will be successful in that regard. They will however get the 'pathways' that mimic the streets. These pathways would line up with the streets and go throughout the site, however, they would not be actual mapped steets. I say all this with only one disclaimer: I am not the project manager for reviewing this proposal; so I am not 100% sure whether the community will end up successful.

You are correct that CB7's new zoning is irrelevant to the Gluck-Chetrit development at Park West Village. While the community board recommended that Park West Village be included in the rezoning, city planning would not do it. A few of the reasons as I understood them to be were:

1. The Tenants Association was looking for a "Special Planned Preservation District," and while our office was supportive, DCP did not want to do it.

2. The development's foundation would likely be in the ground prior to the full ULURP (which appears to have happened)

3. A 'contextual zoning' would have required a 'street wall' along the entire street (cutting away even the two small pedestrian pathways)

4. The development wouldn't really be 'contextual' to the block. (Contextual zoning like brownstones don't really fit in with PWV's tower design as something that is 'contextual')

5. A downzoning would have been difficult since the zoning on PWV is already at one of the lowest densities in Manhattan.



Brian Cook
Senior Planner
Land Use Planning & Development Unit
Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer
Municipal Building, One Centre Street, 19th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Office: 212- 669-2224
Fax: 212- 669 7862
Bcook@manhattanbp.org

Friday, September 7, 2007

Columbia Spectator Report on Comm. Bd. 7 & the Dig

Construction of Whole Foods Irks CB7

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 7, 2007, Columbia Spectator

Construction at Columbus Avenue between 97th and 100th Streets continues to rattle windows and ruffle its neighbors’ feathers this week after city inspectors lifted an order that stopped some of the work in late July when a retaining wall at the site collapsed.

The site of the future Columbus Village commercial strip and residential complex, which is slated to include a Whole Foods Market, was deemed safe by the Department of Buildings on Sept. 3—a little over a month after the collapse forced the evacuation of the building next door on 97th Street.

The developers, Lawrence Gluck and Joseph Chetrit, came together with the Community Board for the first time to apologize for the collapse and to listen to community concerns this August.

But area residents still fear that the site is unsafe, according to Sheldon Fine, the chair of Community Board 7. CB7 is investigating the cause of the collapse with the borough president’s office, and the city council introduced a bill to limit the use of explosives and blasting at construction sites.

Nearby residents are also coping with day-to-day frustrations of living next to a huge hole in the ground. “Lives have been under siege for months,” Fine said, as drilling, digging, and excavation for the 320,000 square feet of retail space and residential towers can be heard and felt down Columbus Avenue for three continuous blocks.

Many are also upset that the development will change the architectural character of the neighborhood. “It will stick out like a sore thumb,” said long-time Park West Village resident Maria Watson, about the 29-story tower proposed for the west side of Columbus Avenue.

The developers of Columbus Village had to wait 40 years to make big changes at the site, as a Federal slum-clearance program from the 1950s locked the configuration of the buildings in what is now known as Park West Village. The clause of the program expired, and storefronts along Columbus Avenue were razed last summer.

This June, Whole Foods catered a public meeting at an elementary school cafeteria in an attempt to extend an olive branch to Upper West Side residents who were already voicing concerns about the store’s location in the neighborhood.

They looked to reassure attendees that the company is socially and environmentally responsible—even if the developer it was working with had not met with neighborhood residents at this point in the conversation. As the crowd munched on fresh fruit, wraps, cookies, and asparagus hors d’oeuvres, spokespeople noted the starting wage for any job at Whole Foods is $10 per hour, 85 percent of workers are full-time, all workers receive health benefits, and they use wind credit power.

“Are we perfect? No. Because we’re human,” said Otto Leuschel, the regional vice-president of operations, at the meeting Whole Foods presenters were interrupted by people who began shouting to begin the public comment portion of the night.

Many were concerned that the store’s loading dock would be right next to an elementary school on 97th Street, and that delivery trucks would add to traffic on the block which already gets congested with cars spilling out of Central Park from the East Side. The suggestion was put forward that the store locate at 100th Street, a wider block with less traffic, and that it could hold sway with the developer to make this kind of demand.

Leuschel said that Whole Foods could work on scheduling deliveries to minimize risk to students. However, as to convincing the developer they should set up shop at 100th Street or relocate the loading dock, he said, “We do have power, I don’t know if it is the power you believe we have.”

Sara Vogel can be reached at Sara.Vogel@columbiaspectator.com.

Monday, September 3, 2007

West Side Spirit on the Aftermath of the Wall Collapse

Click here for the West Side Spirit article, "Remedial Work Resumes" (written before the "stop work order" was completely rescinded).

''Stop Work Order'' Lifted

The Department of Buildings has lifted the "stop work" order imposed when the retaining wall collapsed. However, according to the office of Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, investigations proceed on the cause of the collaps

Sunday, August 19, 2007

City Council Proposes New Blasting Law

NY 1, Manhattan


Manhattan
Lawmakers, Residents Call For More Oversight Of Building Demolitions
August 15, 2007

A construction boom is sweeping across the city, but it has also been affecting the quality of life in the five boroughs. In the wake of a major wall collapse in Manhattan, city lawmakers are proposing safety measures for construction sites which have permits to use explosives. NY1’s Sandra Endo filed the following report.

Last month's wall collapse at a construction site on the Upper West Side is raising concern.

“The blasts are outrageous,” said one Upper West Side resident. “Not only do you hear it, you feel it.”

Residents Wednesday joined forces with city lawmakers to crack down on development sites which use explosives to gain more ground. They say blasting away rock is a recipe for disaster.

“The day of the collapse the blasts were so big you could be on 95th and Columbus and you were frightened out of your skin,” said another resident.

Lawmakers plan to introduce a bill next month to put more safety measures in place. It would require agencies to work together to coordinate massive construction work being done at one time in one neighborhood and create more oversight on developers using explosives on site.

“If the blasting doesn't happen in the appropriate way, if the affects of the blasting is not assessed by city government, if person who is not qualified does it, real tragedy can occur,” said City Council Speaker Christine Quinn.

This new legislation would require developers to put up more warning signs all throughout the neighborhood and also the fire department would have to give out prior written notification to community boards and area residents.

The fire department is in charge of issuing blasting permits, which are good for three years. Lawmakers want to limit that to three months.

Both the FDNY and the Department of Buildings say they will review the legislation when it's introduced next month.

-Sandra Endo