Join Commissioner Adrian Benepe at
THE GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY
For the New Swimming Pool at
Frederick Douglass Playground
has been postponed until March 2007
Preserve West Park North, a new coalition of neighborhood activists, organized the Speak Out after they spotted an ad in a real estate magazine two weeks ago. It was an artist’s rendering that showed part of their community, the stretch of Columbus Avenue between 97th to 100th Streets, barely recognizable, looking like a glitzy midtown street. In the drawing, three uninterrupted blocks with 235,000 square feet of upscale glass shops supported a centerpiece – a 29-story luxury residential tower jutting up from what is now an airy esplanade of 45-year-old shade trees.
Finally, the residents had a picture of what their landlord intended to do to their unique community of almost 5,000 people, whose original planners had carefully balanced the size and shape of buildings with open space and sky around them. These proposed glass buildings would stick out like a sore thumb amidst the subdued red brick 16-story architecturally uniform apartment houses that now sit placidly on landscaped lawns.
Residents dubbed the alien-looking tower “The Spike,” “El Pincho” in Spanish.
This mammoth structure being marketed by their landlord would cut off the three Park West Village rental buildings on Columbus Avenue from the four mixed condo and rent stabilized buildings on Central Park West, creating a barrier that would slice their original planned community in half. If the plan is realized, the superblock holding 784, 788 and 792 Columbus Avenue will be without direct access to Columbus Avenue and will no longer be physically unified with their sister buildings 372, 382, 392 and 400 Central Park West. Landscaped green spaces that were part of the village’s original late 1950s plan would be built on or paved over. Resident parking lots would disappear.
Already four blocks of local shops that served the community – including the diner, discount store, hardware store, bakery, restaurant, deli and supermarket – are boarded up, perhaps for years. And residents believe “The Spike” is only the beginning.
“There is more land here to be dug up. We just don’t know his strategy.” said Lois Hoffmann, president of the Park West Village Tenants Association. She added that the city may be formulating plans to build on open spaces in the Frederick Douglass complex, too.
For months landlord Laurence Gluck and his partner Joseph Chetrit had kept their plans under wraps. The first indication that development was afoot came last September, when 11 local shops and eateries that lined the village along Columbus and Amsterdam received notices to vacate. Community pressure
managed to keep them open for a few extra months. The C-Town supermarket – geared to serve a range of familes from condo owners to working and poor families – was the last to close on May 5. The community held a rally with 300 people pushing empty shopping carts to show their distress. But despite pleas from residents and elected officials, the landlord withheld his grand scheme from the people who would be most affected…until that illustration surfaced in the trade magazine.
“Fifty years ago, Robert Moses encouraged the city to acquire this land by eminent domain. It was sold to developers at bargain prices in order to create attractive, affordable housing for working and middle class families,” said Vivian Dee, president of Preserve West Park North. “The people built a unified neighborhood that has endured for years. Is it justified that someone should buy this property and make an enormous profit by dismantling what was created as a special planned community?”
“The original plans for Park West Village created the Central Park West and Columbus Avenue superblocks and developers were allowed to build seven large buildings of 300 and 400 apartments each in exchange for open spaces,” Hoffmann added. “At least 5,000 people call these 2,500 apartments home. If someone is going to affect our community by increasing the acceptable density of housing and by disregarding the needs of our longstanding community, we have to have a voice.”
The closing of the shopping strips was the catalyst for forming Preserve West Park North, a coalition of resident, community and religious groups between Central Park West and Amsterdam Avenue, from 86th to 106th Streets. It is a formalization of the close-knit relationship among activists who live in Park West Village; current and former Mitchell-Lamas such as Tower West, Central Park Gardens, Town House West and Westgate; and NYCHA-owned Frederick Douglass Houses. Their motto: “Nothing About Us Without Us.”
Residents have so far gathered almost 2,000 petition signatures to present to Mayor Bloomberg, Planning Commissioner Amanda Burden and Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer. The petition asks them to save and preserve Park West Village and Frederick Douglass Houses and to assure that any future development meets the needs of the surrounding community. They have hired a lawyer.
At the Speak-Out, the group will survey the attendees to find out what they would like to see in the community, explained Sue Susman, president of Central Park Gardens and founder of the citywide Mitchell-Lama web site www.save-ml.org.
“We want a voice in what happens in our neighborhood, to protect our homes particularly in the longstanding community between 97th and 100th Streets between Central Park West and Amsterdam Avenue,” Susman said. “Among other things, we want to stay healthy with light and air and open space. We want affordable shopping and affordable housing. We want our community to stay intact.”
Hoffmann summed it up: “We had restaurants where neighbors would gather and places to shop and now you have to walk blocks and blocks just to get a newspaper or a cup of coffee. They’re chipping away our hometown feeling.”
# # #
6/1/06
(For more background on Preserve West Park North, you may refer to the web site www.preservewpn.org, where you will find the news release and clips from the May 6 Shopping Cart Rally.)
If you want affordable housing, affordable local stores, trees and a chance to see the sky once in a while, come to voice your needs and concerns.
_________________________________
Click here to see an artist's rendering from a real estate magazine where the landlord is already advertising three contiguous blocks of retail space (“over 235,000 Square Feet”) on Columbus from 97th to 100th Street, available for high-end commercial space. Note that only half of the height of the 29-story-plus residential luxury tower (“The Spike”) is shown and more are planned. This huge structure would cut off access to Columbus Avenue for 784, 788 and 792, and add a road somewhere, thus splitting the original village in two and dismantling the superblocks and our sense of community.
Click here for a copy of the flyer announcing the meeting -- in English and Spanish. You need Acrobat Reader to download this file. You can get Acrobat Reader for free.With the upper Upper West Side already awaiting the completion of Extell's twin Ariel West and Ariel East developments on Broadway and 99th, folks over on Columbus Avenue have their own megaproject to celebrate. A Curbed correspondent reports:
Community Board 7 is up in arms over a proposal to develop a 29-story residential tower with commercial space fronting Columbus Ave. The site in question sits on the super-block between 97th and 100th St that used to be occupied by several commercial vendors, including a recently closed C-Town on the corner of 100th and Columbus. The site is being developed by the beloved Extell, and is being fought by all the usual suspects, including residents of Park West Village.No word yet on the Stop Extell blog, nor renderings of 808 Columbus, though Crain's has a few details about the commercial space. Anyone know more?Last night Community Board 7's 97th-110th St Task Force approved a draft resolution that would rezone Extell's proposed with a height-ceiling to prevent proliferation of 808 Columbus Aves - but since that site is being developed as is, there's nothing the Community Board of the City Planning Commission can do to stop 808.
West Side Spirit, May 25, 2006, p. 22
POLS, RESIDENTS GLIMPSE FUTURE
Park West Village project inspires fresh debate
By Charlotte Eichna
A picture of the future has surfaced at last.
And residents, for the most part, aren’t happy.
The image in question would be a rendering of what developers intend to build amidst a plot of land known as Park West Village, a planned middle class community on Columbus Avenue in the upper 90s that includes several apartment buildings, street-fronts and open space.
For months, neighbors speculated about what would appear in their backyards. A protest recently punctuated the closing of a C-Town supermarket, the last of the local merchants whose stores once populated the area. Developers said they intended to share their plans with the community, but nothing concrete had been made public.
Then a resident came across an advertisement for 808 Columbus Avenue in a real estate trade publication. There, laid out in color, was a rendering of the proposed building and commercial space.
“It’s totally out of place in the community. It’s a midtown [building]. The commercial stuff is like the Time Warner building – all glass,” said Vivian Dee, a Park West Village resident. “It’s alienating, it’s cold.”
She is particularly incensed that the residential tower would essentially block off half of Park West Village – the part that is mostly condominiums, between Columbus Avenue and Central Park West – from the other half of the community, which consists of rentals between Columbus and Amsterdam avenues.
“Columbus Avenue then becomes a barrier between the two parts of Park West Village,” she said.
Dee, who heads up the Preserve West Park North Coalition, the group that organized the protest in early May, said she is planning a June 1 town hall meeting to discuss the project.
Although the site’s owners and developers, the Chetrit Group and Stellar Management, haven’t finalized the design yet, they are currently planning a 29-story residential tower of market-rate rentals, according to a spokeswoman, Kathleen Cudahy, and new storefronts.
“There will be a lot of green space on top of the commercial space,” she said.
They also hope to turn the village’s parking lots into green space and move parking underground.
Developers ay the plans are as-of-right and don’t require community review and approval, an assertion that has been questioned by some.
Community meetings are still being planned, Cudahy said, so that residents can share their thoughts about what sort of businesses they’d like to see in the commercial space. “We know that they need a food store,” she said. “These are all things that we’d appreciate hearing from the community on.”
Whole Foods, she confirmed, had been discussed as a tenant, although there were concerns about it being too pricey.A representative from Whole Foods said the company did not talk about potential locations except during quarterly earnings calls.
Both Borough President Scott Stringer and Assembly Member Daniel O’Donnell have met with developers to review the architectural renderings.
“I told them I thought they had to go back to the drawing board and come up with more than one potential option for them to present to the community,” O’Donnell said explaining that because it was a very articulate and involved community, the developers would be doing themselves a favor by seeking local input.
While saying he understands that real estate is a business, O’Donnell indicated he’d be happier if the proposed residential tower were more in line with its 16-story Park West Village neighbors.
“The community exists in a wonderful, harmonious way and we should do everything we can to protect that harmony and not have Midtown-like skyscrapers in the middle of our blocks,” he said.
Anthony Borelli, Stringer’s director of land use, planning and development, said the plans would have a significant impact on the community and stressed the importance of involving residents.
“The developer also has a responsibility to look out for the quality of life of the folks he collects rents from,” Borelli said.
Cudahy, the developers’ spokesperson, said designers did take into consideration what views might be blocked by new construction. At one point, they had discussed building two towers on either end of the plot.
“If you do that, you block the views of the people who are closer to the new proposed building,” she said. “Distance between the proposed tower and the existing tower to the west is in excess of 200 feet. That’s wider than any avenue in the city, it’s quite a distance. So in order to preserve as many views as possible, we felt that the single tower is a better way to go.”
And click here to see the English-Spanish flyer for the rally. You can scroll down the page to see some articles about it.